|
Abhija
| |
| | Monday, August 20, 2007 - 2:17 pm: | 
| 
|
Panna, feedback baddal dhanyavaad:-)
|
Abhija
| |
| | Monday, August 20, 2007 - 2:23 pm: |
|
|
गणेशोत्सव जवळ येतोय...
ऑगस्ट महिना म्हणजे गणपतीच्या मूर्ती तयार करायच्या मूर्तीशाळां घडवत आणलेल्या मूर्तींनी गजबजून जातात.
मूर्तीशाळेत गणपती कसे तयार करतात ते पहायला १९ ऑगस्टला लालबागला गेलो होतो. मूर्तींना अजुन फिनिशिंग टच दिला नाही. उत्सवाच्या आधी साधारण १०-१५ दिवसांत मूर्ती पूर्णपणे तयार होतील असे वाटते. ही छायाचित्र फ्लॅश व ट्रायपॉड न वापरता अव्हेलेबल लाईटमध्ये काढली आहेत.
ऑगस्ट महिन्यात गणेशोत्सवासाठी जश्या मूर्तीशाळां गजबजू लागतात, तशीच टाळ-मृदंगांची दुकानं देखिल गजबजू लागतात.
त्या दिवशीच्या फोटोशूटमधील एक फोटो माझ्या ब्लॉगवर पोस्ट केला आहे.
http://www.abhijitsplanet.com/pratibimb/index.php?showimage=83
धन्यवाद! :-)
|
She was a street urchin selling flags. Ashya prakarchya photography la street/travel photography mhaNtaat.Ashya photography madhye aapaN anek vyaktinche fotos ghet asto. Pratyekache model release gheNe shakya naste. >>>
US and international law states that a formal approval must be taken before publishing your images in any media, irrespective of interest (commercial or anything else). In case of friends and other people you know, this normally does not happen. In Europe (and US) at least photographing on the street without permission may exasperate people. While publishing this in a local newspaper I had to find these students in Göttingen and ask for permission (they were more than happy). To make images though often all you need is a smile and show camera for approval.
As is often a case many photographer shoot people in india and other third world countries as a reportage or hobby and publish them. 99% of them do not make money and end up as memories. However there have also been cases where the photographed has benefited as much
and vice versa
|
Abhija
| |
| | Monday, August 20, 2007 - 3:23 pm: |
|
|
Prashant, thanks for the detailed info:-)
|
Chinnu
| |
| | Monday, August 20, 2007 - 6:49 pm: |
|
|
अभिजा, खुप सुंदर फोटो आला आहे मुर्तींचा. वर्षांपुर्वी परळ वर्कशॉपमध्ये पाहिलेल्या अश्या मुर्ती घडवितांना. तास न तास टक लावून बसावेसे वाटायचे तिथे!
|
Psg
| |
| | Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 4:45 am: |
|
|
अभिजीत, सुरेख फोटो आले आहेत गणेशमूर्तींचे!
|
Abhija
| |
| | Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 5:09 am: |
|
|
Chinnu, Psg Thanks for the feedback:-)
|
Maanus
| |
| | Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 10:52 am: |
|
|
prashant congratulations on new D80 
Prashant/Abhijit, do you embed color profile in your photographs when you save them for web? if you do, how to do that and which profile should be used.
I am guessing sRGB is good.
I use Photoshop / Lightroom on mac os x, I have also configured those application to use sRGB profile and not the camera (D70) or monitor (LCD) profile. but for some reasons the photographs looks different on mac (very good color) and on windows (dull white).
do you know how to fix this.
|
Maanuns,
Yes, it is important to convert the image to sRGB (which is a generic profile, good for most web-browsers).
I do not recommend using sRGB in the editor really (photoshop/lightroom etc). I personally use ProphotoRGB but ADOBE RGB (free) is also good enough. Here are couple of articles that are in the pipeline which you may want to read and 2.
ciao
|
D80...well it is a long story why I chnaged from EOS to Nikon.
The reason images look different on Mac/windows is 'coz of gamma is different.
|
"का रे दुरावा...?"
अभिजित वरचे सगळे फोटो सुरेख आलेत......
हा एक मी काढलेला
|
Abhija
| |
| | Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 12:33 pm: |
|
|
Manus,
Photographychya technicalities madhye me ekdam "Aurangzeb" aahe:-) TaripaN jee mahiti wachliy tee sangto.
sRGB is good for webwork..universally accepted profile. Adobe RGB gives better colors though. If you want to submit images to National geographic, they accept only Adobe RGB images.
Well! It is better to use the same color profile in camera as well as in photo editor.
U see diff colors in mac/windows. as prashant mentioned, that is b'coz of gamma difference.
adobe gamma adjustment in pc/mac is not so truthful, so professionals use hardware calibraters. They are accurate in calibration.
Please confirm the above-mentioned with Prashant.
|
Abhija
| |
| | Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 12:35 pm: |
|
|
Lopa, thanks! :-)
Ka re durava foto chhan. ThoDa contrast wadhavlas tar ajun chhan disel ase mala waTate-)
|
Maanus
| |
| | Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 12:53 pm: |
|
|
wow that was quick. thanks.
but is there any way to fix it? i mean how to make sure image look same on mac as well as windows.
P.S.: can you guys surround your text with \ -1 { _YOUR_TEXT_GOES HERE . no space between \ -1 and {.}
|
I use Gretag tools http://www.xrite.com/top_Products.aspx which I find the best investment. I have saved more in inksfor my Epson R1800/2200 and Hahnemühle papers than paid for.
However, for hobby-level I find adobe gamma to do a fine job. If you are going to print yourself, help yourself, run to a store nearby and get calibration tolls.
by the way, I've been dreaming of iMac for a long time but it is at this point of time out of reach for me due to cost consideration; envy you.
And the 2nd link should read this : http://www.prashanteju.de/raw.html
|
Chetnaa
| |
| | Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 12:56 pm: |
|
|
अभिजित, लोपा छान फ़ोटो...
" का रे दुरावा " नाव मस्तच...
|
but is there any way to fix it? i mean how to make sure image look same on mac as well as windows. >>>
If you are using Adobe products, it comes with Knoll Gamma Corrector control panel, set it to 2.2
That should help, if not let me know.
I'm traveling with laptop so I can check maayboli often.
|
Maanus
| |
| | Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 1:06 pm: |
|
|
by the way, I've been dreaming of iMac yes i know . I read your blog (humm cant find that link now). Steve should reduce the cost now, he has earned a lot recently.
Prints are coming well. instead of buying some x printer I generally use Target shop, they have nice printers and charge less. If ISO is more than 250, prints come really well.
I dont know what gamma stuff is, I'll have to study that. thanks for the links.
|
Steve should reduce the cost now, he has earned a lot recently. >>>
It actually is not about the cost of iMac as such (which is quite expensive though) but the cost of other tools I have invested in like Adobe photoshop, I do not want to pay $$$s to adobe for cross platform version or completely new version of photoshop.
I can better spend that money on a trip to some national park, fall is around the corner.
|
Maanus
| |
| | Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 1:31 pm: |
|
|
oh as the user base is growing, mac users have also started to follow windows path to obtain s/w. i guess you know what i mean. however as you are professional or company you may not be able to follow that path.
btw nice paintings.
|
|
|